Source Code Control System - Wikipedia.
I believe that wikipedia is not a reliable source because of it’s use of wrong editors, silencing accurate contributor, and the fact that it is written on their website. Knowledge and information should come from people who are an expert’s on certain topic and can prove that their claims are the truth, but for wikipedia it not one of those sources that should be used.
How to cite Wikipedia. Date published November 29, 2019 by Jack Caulfield. Date updated: January 14, 2020. In academic writing, whenever you quote or paraphrase someone else’s work or draw on their ideas, you need to cite the original source. Wikipedia is a useful source of background information that students often use in the early stages of research.
The community is so split on what constitutes a reliable source that many have also written essays about the flaws with the reliable source guidelines. Regardless, I find it better to stick to some of the main reliable sources that are accepted in the community (e.g., major newspapers, magazines) as most Wikipedia writing services do.
Wikipedia is not a reliable source. Wikipedia can be edited by anyone at any time. This means that any information it contains at any particular time could be vandalism. Wikipedia generally uses reliable secondary sources, which vet data from primary sources.
All things considered, it is probably a reliable source of information. Researchers need credible sources of information. Such reliable sources are those upon which people can depend and trust. One can't really trust Wikipedia, the encyclopedia that anyone can edit, as a credible source. Why not? Well, precisely because anyone can edit it!
It depends. I am an administrator on Malayalam Wikipedia. I also do recent changes patrolling on English Wikipedia. A lot of my time on Wikipedia is spent removing vandalism and misinformation from the articles. But I am far from some lone altruis.
Numerous studies have rated Wikipedia's accuracy. On the whole, the web encyclopedia is fairly reliable, but Life's Little Mysteries own small investigation produced mixed results.